campaign funds

I have grabbed onto this campaign fund issue - like a bulldog with an attitude. Looking at the decision and the history of campaigning, it seems that the supreme court has opened the doors for any company IN THE WORLD to contribute to any individual's election. That means (in the most paranoid way) that Al Queda or drug cartels or shoddy backroom off-shore drug manufacturers could select, promote and finance a candidate that would vote to soften issues that would further their aims. Do you want this to happen? Hopefully the Supreme Court will review and redebate this issue.